EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 47392 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region Please login or register to post comments.
Electoral Fairytalism Electoral Fairytalism An aggressor, a heavily armed terrorist, an authoritarian socialist, and a bloodthirsty tyrant from the Middle Ages — the desperate political creatures who scramble for reverse engineering Roman Udot / Wednesday, May 28, 2025 0 2579 Among the methods to rig elections, there is the most disgusting one. It is used when the culprits are even unable to organise a “decent” fabrication on a large-scale level. Read more
Test images 2025-05-09 Test images 2025-05-09 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet EG / Friday, May 9, 2025 0 119 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet Read more
Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Without any doubt: The official data from the Presidential Elections in Venezuela were fabricated Roman Udot / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 0 7994 The numbers announced by Venezuela's electoral commission were fabricated in the same way that they were fabricated in the occupied Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine for the 2024 Russian presidential election. Read more
On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated Explore the truth using open, expert-built visualization tools — a live masterclass in data forensics by Roman Udot. Roman Udot / Tuesday, March 19, 2024 0 320 TV Rain's live show became a forensic milestone — a third of a million people understood how falsification can be revealed using open data tools. Read more
The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The candidates' results do not show the randomness expected from the free expression of citizens' will Roman Udot / Tuesday, March 19, 2024 0 8484 Calculations in the commissions of the Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions were carried out in reverse: the number of votes for candidates was obtained by multiplying the turnout by the planned percentages for the candidates. Read more