EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 47641 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region Please login or register to post comments.
Tyumen Oblast Tyumen Oblast Gubernatorial election, 2023 EG / Wednesday, October 11, 2023 0 2031 Read more
Additions to our Lab: Special tools! Additions to our Lab: Special tools! EG / Tuesday, October 10, 2023 0 13592 We are launching a new section in our Lab: Special tools. Each tool in the lab can be made for an individual election or a group of elections. The first such instrument we place The integrated statistical data analyzer specifically made for the 2023 Unified Election Day. Read more
DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram DIY Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram The presentation of a new interactive tool EG / Monday, September 25, 2023 0 39847 Good news for electoral observers, journalists and election investigators. You have a new and long-awaited tool - the interactive Kiesling-Shpilkin diagram. This detailed video lesson will help you understand how to work with this kit, what the advantages of an integrated approach are, how the tools help each other to detect an anomaly, or how the findings of one tool confirm the findings of another. In the lecture, we detected falsifications in the Moscow region. Read more
Concept of the Electoral.Graphics website Concept of the Electoral.Graphics website EG / Monday, November 9, 2020 0 20711 The concept of the Electoral.Graphics website is to bring together different types of electoral information: elections, data, investigations and research. Producing new knowledge. Read more
Doubting Thomas's Crash Test Doubting Thomas's Crash Test A lesson-investigation. Navigating the site. Working with Scatter Plotter and Gabdulvaleev Plotter EG / Monday, November 9, 2020 0 52538 How to win over opponents, convince the wavering, build confidence in supporters? By properly navigating the site! Read more