EG / Monday, July 20, 2020 / Categories: Articles by geography, Russia, Unimodality, Dependence of results on the turnout, Kiesling-Shpilkin method, Integer percentages, Observation, Strings of Gabdulvaleev, Geographical Anomalies, Russia A bell, a saw, an axe Scientists who study election statistics are calling last week's vote on constitutional amendments that, among other things, would allow Vladimir Putin to remain president until 2036, the most unfair in 20 years. According data to the Central Election Commission (CEC), with a turnout of 65%, 77.92% of voters voted in favor of the amendments, against — 21.27%. Immediately after the results were summarized, electoral analysts began to publish graphs proving that this result could have been achieved only with the help of large-scale falsifications. For example, in the opinion of physicist Sergei Shpilkin, the actual voter turnout was about 44%, and the share of those who voted in favor of the amendments — about 65%. That is, only 29.3 million Russians supported the amendments to the Constitution. It is not easy to understand the complex analysis and graphs of electoral analysts, so «Important Stories» has prepared a visual explainer explaining why the past vote cannot be considered fair and what was the real scale of fraud. Understanding these graphs will give you a better understanding of electoral statistics and whether you should trust the official voting results. Just scroll down the visualization. #document Print 48648 Tags: FalsificationsRF Constitutional Referendum 2020 Данные для статьиfullLaboratory support for articlefullDossier's BlockRF Constitutional Referendum 2020Theoretic depthObservation Related articles A triumphant victory over myself On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated Doubting Thomas's Crash Test New parameters to explore Funny story about the Tambov region Please login or register to post comments.
On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic On Fabricated Election Results in the Donetsk People's Republic The results of the election for the Head of the Donetsk People's Republic were fabricated. EG / Monday, November 3, 2014 0 7447 First, they drew up the percentages and only then calculated the absolute numbers. When votes are counted, rather than results fabricated, the process should be the other way around. Read more
On Elections in Syria On Elections in Syria The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. EG / Sunday, June 8, 2014 0 6571 The election results in Syria are just as fabricated as those in Luhansk. The organisers also calculated the number of voters based on predetermined percentages. Read more
In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 0 7685 It can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Read more
On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region A mathematician detected falsification using three numerals EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 0 6594 When results are fabricated, percentages are first made up, and absolute numbers are then calculated from them. That's how they got caught. Read more
Elections and statistics: the United Russia casus belli (2009-2020) Elections and statistics: the United Russia casus belli (2009-2020) October 22, 2009, December 2011 through April 2012, May 2018, July 2020, September 2020 Alexander Shen / Thursday, January 1, 2009 0 9769 Alexander Shen's classic work, written by him in 2009, and continued for 11 years. Read more