Criticism and bibliography Criticism and bibliography Borisov I.B., Zadorin I.V., Ignatov A.V., Marachevsky V.N., Fedorov V.I., Mathematical tools of election delegitimization. Report of the Russian Public Institute of Electoral Law. Moscow, 2020, Wednesday, September 16, 2020 0 29518 The peer-reviewed paper again raises the question about the incorrectness of the statistical analysis. But it is based on a misunderstanding: the authors rightly point out and confirm with numerous examples that the histograms of elections may well be very different from the «Gaussian» even in the absence of falsifications. Probably, they have not seen the works mentioned above and assume that so far the conclusions about falsifications are based on the deviation from «Gaussianity».
Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing... Review of the ROIPP report "Mathematical Tools for Delegitimizing... Sunday, September 6, 2020 0 26282 Yes, something must be done with our society, which «still has some flaws». It is very gullible and therefore prefers Shpilkin to Borisov. But it is necessary to implement a number of measures to remove distrust in the procedures for establishing the results of voting». It is possible, for example, to establish not only a...
Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report Mathematical tools for delegitimizing elections. Report 3 сентября 2020 года на сайте Российского общественного института избирательного права (РОИИП) был опубликован... Thursday, September 3, 2020 0 32506