EG / Wednesday, May 14, 2014 / Categories: Articles by geography, Ukraine, Luhansk Oblast, Methods of analysis, Reverse Engineering In Luhansk, addition was dismissed as a Bandera method. It can be considered proven that the "results" were determined arbitrarily. Boris Ovchinnikov writes: The results of voting are usually determined by an arithmetic operation called addition — first, data from precincts are summed up to get results for district election commissions, and then district results are further summed up into regional and national results. In Luhansk, summation was rejected as a "Bandera method," and multiplication was used instead. Multiplication of numbers made up from thin air. This is evident from the fact that there are two percentage figures — the percentage of turnout relative to the number of registered voters and the percentage of votes in favour of independence relative to valid ballots — that match with a precision of up to three decimal places. 75.2000% and 96.2000% (for reference: if real numbers were summed, with a probability of more than 99.9%, their ratio would yield non-rounded percentages — like 75.2637%). The probability that two rounded percentages coincidentally match this way is less than one in a million. Thus, it can be considered proven that the "results" of the referendum, at least in the Luhansk region, were determined arbitrarily by its organizers, without any connection to the actual voting results. Print 7092 Tags: Ukraine Luhansk obl Referendum 2014 More links Voting results are usually determined by an arithmetic operation such as addition...The original Facebook post by Boris Ovchinnikov. Related articles Electoral Fairytalism On the fabricated results of the referendum in the Luhansk region Ukraine, Luhansk oblast, Referendum 2014 Please login or register to post comments.
Electoral Fairytalism Electoral Fairytalism An aggressor, a heavily armed terrorist, an authoritarian socialist, and a bloodthirsty tyrant from the Middle Ages — the desperate political creatures who scramble for reverse engineering Roman Udot / Wednesday, May 28, 2025 0 2579 Among the methods to rig elections, there is the most disgusting one. It is used when the culprits are even unable to organise a “decent” fabrication on a large-scale level. Read more
Test images 2025-05-09 Test images 2025-05-09 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet EG / Friday, May 9, 2025 0 119 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet Read more
Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Unbelievable data from Venezuela's Presidential election with a Russian smack Without any doubt: The official data from the Presidential Elections in Venezuela were fabricated Roman Udot / Wednesday, July 31, 2024 0 7994 The numbers announced by Venezuela's electoral commission were fabricated in the same way that they were fabricated in the occupied Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions of Ukraine for the 2024 Russian presidential election. Read more
On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated On air: uncover how Putin’s landslide in 2024 was fabricated Explore the truth using open, expert-built visualization tools — a live masterclass in data forensics by Roman Udot. Roman Udot / Tuesday, March 19, 2024 0 320 TV Rain's live show became a forensic milestone — a third of a million people understood how falsification can be revealed using open data tools. Read more
The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The voting results in the LNR and Zaporizhzhia regions are fabricated The candidates' results do not show the randomness expected from the free expression of citizens' will Roman Udot / Tuesday, March 19, 2024 0 8484 Calculations in the commissions of the Luhansk and Zaporizhzhia regions were carried out in reverse: the number of votes for candidates was obtained by multiplying the turnout by the planned percentages for the candidates. Read more